User talk:Tm/Archive 11

Over-categorization[edit]

Please don't add files that are already properly categorized to more general categories. Avoid COM:OVERCAT. --Zinnsoldat (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of images to Santa Maria (Azores)[edit]

In reference to your categorization of several photos (49) by Michael Gaylard to Category:Santa Maria (Azores), please note that this is incorrect. The images referred do not show any aspect of the island (location or content), but rather depict events, actions or imagery from the island of Madeira. Further, Mr. Gaylard has named his files for the ship/caravel/cruise depicted in his original Flicker account. I kindly request that those images remain associated with the location (Madeira) or be classified/categorized accordingly with the ship or other aspects of the imagery. One thing is clear: these images are not associated with the island of Santa Maria in the Azores, as you insist.^{ruben jc}ZEORYMER (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Range block?[edit]

Hello,

It seems that we have to calm down an incompetent user(*). How can a range block be demanded? Our over-/mis-categorizer is there: Special:Contributions/2408:8215:1C01:751:84F3:23B8:748:17D0/32.

(*) I'm also rather incompetent but I listen to others' remarks.

--Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintage Star Wars LED Watches by Texas Instruments, Dated 1977 (8322270748).jpg[edit]

File:Vintage Star Wars LED Watches by Texas Instruments, Dated 1977 (8322270748).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DiegoAma (talk) 02:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintage Star Wars Red LED Watch By Texas Instruments, Copyright 1977 (15416565144).jpg[edit]

File:Vintage Star Wars Red LED Watch By Texas Instruments, Copyright 1977 (15416565144).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DiegoAma (talk) 02:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ravenhill Stadium[edit]

Is there any plausible reason for this revert (and I mean 'plausible')? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 22:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any plausible reason for reshape an image in 3:2 aspect ratio over the original upload (and I mean 'plausible')? Tm (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. 3:2 is the normal photo aspect ratio and grass is not relevant. Thanks for not providing any good reason. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22 January 2020 (UTC)

No. Again no 'plausible' reason given to upload a new version over an original one just because you think that all images have to have one aspect ration. Thanks for not providing any good reason. Tm (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization[edit]

Hi Tm, @Estopedist1: removed Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization from Category:To be checked. I, as a consequence removed the images from Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization, as all the images are in Category:Photographs by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization anyhow. And to get them into Category:Uncategorized to enforce proper categorization where missing. Category:Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization needs further categorization into subcategories (it is too crowded) and categorization by persons, events and location. It does not help to undo this. It would help if you could further categorize some of the images. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:20, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fertagus (39997743382).ogv[edit]

File:Fertagus (39997743382).ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AIRPOWER16 - Air to Air SK35C Draken (29321174321).jpg[edit]

File:AIRPOWER16 - Air to Air SK35C Draken (29321174321).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

D-Kuru (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Malmö Pride 2017 (36401578456).jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motociclistas na Praça do Marquês de Pombal (29783040177).webm[edit]

File:Motociclistas na Praça do Marquês de Pombal (29783040177).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:From Court 17 to Court Suzanne Lenglen (47524999251).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:From Court 17 to Court Suzanne Lenglen (47524999251).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

File:Court 7 (40529445153).jpg

Regards, Jonteemil (talk) 22:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Aston Martin (23914870230).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aston Martin (23914870230).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Some might be COM:De minimis but I don't know. If you think some are, remove the DW-template and I'll start a normal DR so people that know more than me can decide.

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Aston Martin (23914870230).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 15:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_portrayals_of_Fruit_Ninja[edit]

Category:Nude_portrayals_of_Fruit_Ninja has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Carlinmack (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 - Best of Attendees DF2 7234 (49006086217).jpg[edit]

File:2019 - Best of Attendees DF2 7234 (49006086217).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 06:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing the cache[edit]

Hi. When you redirected Category:Musical instrument museums in Portugal to Category:Music museums in Portugal the redirected category is still showing as an empty cat in the target category. One way to solve this quickly is a null edit. Open the redirected page, go to the very end and delete the automatic empty space. Save the category (any summary you wish) and it won’t actually save it but it removes the redirected category from the target category. I hope that’s useful. 193.62.152.193 11:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Model Rosie on a bed - In Black and White (14192377223).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Model Rosie on a bed - In Black and White (14192377223).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stoya_in_2014[edit]

Stoya in 2014 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FredWalsh (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nikki_Benz_in_2012[edit]

Nikki Benz in 2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FredWalsh (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Amanda Beard on the Red Carpet (cropped).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, QTHCCAN (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why you reverted my colorization picture?[edit]

Sorry for my bad English. Why you reverted my colorization picture? Bảo Khương 1997 ĐH Kiến Trúc (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Bảo Khương 1997 ĐH Kiến Trúc: COM:Colorization, upload as a new file please. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:16, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vintage DeForest Audiphone Carbon Hearing Aid Ad From The Detroit Press, October 2, 1932 (14224377234).jpg[edit]

File:Vintage DeForest Audiphone Carbon Hearing Aid Ad From The Detroit Press, October 2, 1932 (14224377234).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Karitxa (talk) 16:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop![edit]

@Tm: I would suggest to by now, stop the reversion of factual category renames which were done to clear the whole mess of incorrect page names created! End of discussion. TheCommonsCorrecteur (talk) 20:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See your talkpage. Please explain how you translate the term "Grã-Cruzes da Ordem de Nossa Senhora da Conceição de Vila Viçosa" translate to english as "Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Viçosa". There is the portuguese word for knight? And before you answer, be advised that your speaking to a portuguese native. Also be advised that hidden behind a fake account will leave you to be blocked. Tm (talk) 20:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: Tm Creating mass reversions to factual and accurate names of categories and refuses to acknowledge this in addition to constant edit warring.TheCommonsCorrecteur (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheCommonsCorrecteur: To someone that started editing in 9 of March you do know your ways, proper words, so this is funny. Evem more funny is accusing me of "edit warring" and calling a specific administrator (a former one). Stop you now or you will be reported and you know what will happen. Tm (talk) 20:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category moves[edit]

Hello. Thank you for the note at the admin boards about the disagreement outlined in the section above this one. I have concluded that you acted correctly and there is no reason for any action against you. Please do carry on the work you are doing but in future I urge you to request administrative help more quickly rather than trying to tackle this kind of disruption by yourself. Cheers. -Green Giant (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Green Giant: Thanks for your time to analise the situation and for your advice. Cheers. Tm (talk) 21:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tory Lanez (36333766651).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 22:50, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why?[edit]

Por favor, infórmame de cuál es la razón de esto, gracias. DPC (talk) 14:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Foi um mero engano. Julgava que adicionava categorias desnecessárias. Tm (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CFD[edit]

Hi TM, instead of discussing through the undo/revert feature, please use the CFD I have tagged you in on to avoid the edit war :). Rereader1996 (talk) 01:24, 01 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your the one that is making an controversial move, so it should be you to open an CFD before making an move, not after. So use that page before any move or the fact that this is not the first time that you make this, and theb fact that you have the same pattern of edits as an user above will be taking in to account when you will be reported for vandalism and edit warring. Tm (talk) 00:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Green Giant: Please review the actions of @Rereader1996: , his multiple warnings in his talkpage, and see if there isnt a funny coincidence in pattern of edits with TheCommonsCorrecteur, the fact that both are from teh UK TheCommonsCorrecteur. A sockpuppet and sockpuppeteer? Tm (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TM, I would suggest to tag me in a comment if you’re responding to mine hence the time taken to respond to yourself...if you will check the CFD I have opened regarding the category, please converse/discuss there rather than being hostile in how you’re coming across whilst using the undo/revert feature; also please refrain from making such accusation of sockpuppeteering just because I’m from the* UK, as there are thousands of us here :). Rereader1996 (talk) 01:39, 01 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one that is reverting and edit warring and you just opened the CFD after your move, so your smoke and mirrors dont work. And you still continue to edit warring. And there is an direct and similar pattern of edits and taking into account this facts is not much a stretch of imagination to see the writing on the wall. Tm (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Tm. Abuse of rights, mass vandalism and hostility towards users.

File:Nathalie Volk (34308971563).jpg[edit]

File:Nathalie Volk (34308971563).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

NVolk97 (talk) 02:46, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my map edit?[edit]

Trying to understand why you reverted my map edit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1855_Colton_Map_of_Kansas_and_Nebraska_(first_edition)_-_Geographicus_-_NebraskaKansas-colton-1855.jpg

Is there a Wikipedia rule that old maps must keep their yellowed aged look? My edit makes the map look more like it did when originally published. Jim Evans (talk) 14:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see you've been going along behind me undoing many of my edits. I spend a lot of time doing these. If you are going to undo them with a quick click please have courtesy to notify me you are doing this and the reason. Jim Evans (talk) 14:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How do you know what was the "look more like it did when originally published", if GLAMs dont know? Also Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Exceptions is pretty clear that "If digital restoration work is being done on a historical document or artwork, the restoration (no matter how minor) should always be uploaded under a new filename from the original file, providing a link back to the source on which it was based in the new file's "other versions" field.". So if you want a new version, upload under a new filename. Hope it is usefull. Tm (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an example, in the file File:Cleveland_First_Cabinet.png cant you see why your claim that you "removed age yellowing" is clearly wrong. Just a hint:

I don't see the map in your link As for Cleveland_First_Cabinet.png. I don't see where I'm wrong Jim Evans (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you dont know your source material, i.e. Carte de visite and what are their characteristics, dont claim to be removing "age yellowing". This is not a hint. Tm (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're a rude sort. What I feel sure it true, a picture of a president of the U.S. with his cabinet would not have been so dull and faded originally. But, from here one I will leave old pictures alone even if one cannot make out much like this one. This is not sarcasm -- Can you tell me how old a picture has to be for it to be called a "historical . . . artwork" Jim Evans (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After being told what is wrong and still think that you know everything is bad and trying to show you what your doing wrong is not being rude.

Again, saying that a "picture of a president of the U.S. with his cabinet would not have been so dull and faded originally" and claim to be removing "age yellowing", shows that you are merely in assumptions based in no knowledge of the source material. See what a Carte de visite, read something about the process. If you want to make a derivative work (i.e. other version), upload your version under a new filename and link to the original. Tm (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question. Can you tell me how old a picture has to be for it to be called a "historical . . . artwork" Jim Evans (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim, I hope you don't mind me jumping into a conversation on your talk page. @Jim Evans: Please see Commons:Overwriting existing files. Except in very limited circumstances, you shouldn't replace an existing image, no matter how historical or recent. It is normally better to upload the alternate version as a new file under a new file name. That way editors can choose whether to use the unaltered original or the enhanced alternative. If you upload your new versions as derivatives of the orignal and licence them on the same terms, your new versions can be kept and used. Feel free to ask for help at the help desk or my talk page if you need assistance with setting up a derivative work. From Hill To Shore (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lisbon" castle walls[edit]

Image File:Moor Castle Walls, Lisbon (31578156765).jpg is not of Lisbon castle. It's way too big and the landscape doesn't fit. Moreover, the area around the castle at Lisbon is densely populated and this shows forested hills. My guess would be that this is either Sintra (but I think that's more densely forested) or Silves. In any case, not Lisbon. --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Filename and category shows very well were this image was taken. Cheers. Tm (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geolocation shows Sintra, though. Also a Moorish castle, but about 30 km from Lisbon. --Ilja.nieuwland (talk) 09:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment But in Lisbon district. Tm (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Explications[edit]

Can you explain why you leave meaningless name to the pictures whith the model Gemma Louise ? --Cody escouade delta (d) 12:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not meaningless names, as these were the names given originally by the photographer and these files have been discussed in several venues. Also why putting the models full name in the filename? Tm (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are totally meaningless. Please read Commons:File naming: “descriptive, chosen according to what the image displays or contents portray”. --Cody escouade delta (d) 12:57, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And this filenames are descriptive, as someone that is a filemover is saying to you. Also why did you rename this files to the models full name, as you did to the category in your last edits here in Commons (in January 2020), when this model name was never mentioned in the files, in the flickr descriptions or in any other place? To someone that blurred an image of two persons in a driving school this is very odd, as is the focus on the files and categories related with this model. Tm (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No they are not descriptive, that is why they were renamed (and not by me). Because this model is known as "Gemma Louise", not only "Gemma", so the full name must appear in the file name.

The pictures of the driving school has been add to promote its company, the user was blocked on the french wikipedia.

--Cody escouade delta (d) 13:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are descriptive, as i filemover is saying. I dont understand your fixation with this model, as you moved the name from a single name to the full name in the category when there was not direct connection and wihtout any reason to move the category, this back in January. Now you want to put her full name in all files??? Wanting to say the full name of the model everywhere, when you blurred the faces in an image of a driving school is ironic in the minimum. Tm (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete foto[edit]

Hi TM I will solve it with OTRS. Need some time to read into how to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elie Hague (talk • contribs) 20:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Osheaga 2017 Attendees (36428075276).jpg

Yours sincerely, Speravir 20:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Html tag[edit]

Hello!

You have the html tag <a href="http://exeypanteleev.com/geeklendar" rel="noreferrer nofollow">exeypanteleev.com/geeklendar</a> in a few file of yours but it doesn't work. Do you know how to fix them?Jonteemil (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Can you please answer.Jonteemil (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!? Can you please respond.Jonteemil (talk) 18:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Floor vs. plenary chamber[edit]

Pore favor pare imediatamente de fazer trapalhada com essas categorias, com moções copy paste. Você está errado. Como o próprio artigo indica, "floor" é o espaço dentro do plenário onde as pessoas falam, não é o próprio plenário. É impressionante, passam os anos e você continua igual. Pare imediatamente com essa mega-trapalhada ou leva bloqueio.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pare você de fazer as suas trapalhadas. Primeiro leia en:Floor (legislative) e estes termos foram aprovados por falantes nativos de inglês. Pare de fazer ameaças de bloqueio e de abusar dessas ferramentas. Se acha que estas categorias devem ser movidas abre uma discussão para mover e espere que outros comentem, em vez da sua politica habitual de mover sem discussão e ameaçar outros. Tm (talk) 21:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Você devia levar bloqueio direto por depois de tantos anos ainda continuar a fazer moções por copy-paste como se ainda fosse um novato inexperiente. "Floor" é um conceito anglófono que sequer existe no Brasil, e como o próprio artigo indica, é apenas uma parte da câmara plenária. Que parte do artigo é que você não percebeu, para continuar a insistir que floor é a mesma coisa que plenário? Onde é que isso está escrito lá,s equer? -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Activity on the floor of a council or legislature, such as debate, may be contrasted with meetings and discussion which takes place in committee, for which there are often separate committee rooms.[1] Some actions, such as the overturning of an executive veto, may only be taken on the floor". Plenário não é mesma coisa que uma comissão parlamentar. Tm (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Senate floor. Tm (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glossário do Senado Federal dos Estados Unidos. Tm (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Porque você traz fontes sobre o senado americano, quando o assunto é o Senado Federal do Brasil? E essa citação não indica de modo algum que "floor" é o mesmo que plenário.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Você leu a própria fonte que colocou? "Action "on the floor" is that which occurs as part of a formal session of the full Senate" - não percebeu que isso e´apenas a forma de designar a actividade que se passa dentro do plenário, e não o próprio plenário?-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

veja aqui como você entendeu tudo errado. Pedir "floor" é pedir para falar durante uma sessão legislativa, não tem qualquer relação com o edifício em si. Entendeu errado, e ainda teve o desplante de reverter de qualquer maneira a correcção que foi feita, até por copypaste.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enfim. sempre a mudar os conceitos. Primeiro o floor era o "espaço dentro do plenário onde as pessoas falam, não é o próprio plenário", agora o floor já é "apenas a forma de designar a actividade que se passa dentro do plenário, e não o próprio plenário". Afinal, ironicamente, floor é um espaço ou uma actividade? Tm (talk) 22:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Você sequer leu o artigo para onde linkou, por acaso? "floor" no parlamento britânico é um espaço próprio onde as pessoas falam, e é daí que vem o termo. Nos outros parlamentos é simplesmente o acto de ter voz e falar na sessão. É nisso que dá ler deficientemente inglês, depois faz essa sopa com tudo.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Veja https://www.senate.ca.gov/ e veja "The next Senate Floor Session will convene on Monday, May 4, 2020". "Senate Floor Session", enfim. Tm (talk) 22:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isso não é o edifício. É impressionante, a casmurrice e a persistência no erro.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:10, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction. Se é, como diz, porque é que este documento fala de que "With very few exceptions, the House determines and enforces its own procedures for considering legislation on the floor. Its standing rules include several alternative sets of procedures for acting on individual bills and resolutions. (...) In general, though, all these procedures permit a majority of Members to work their will without excessive delays. The House passes many bills by motions to suspend the rules, with limited debate and no floor amendments, but only with the support of at least two-thirds of the Members voting." Esclarecedor, aonde há moções, votações, etc no floor. Tm (talk) 22:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quanto tempo vai levar a você perceber que isso não existe no plenário brasileiro? Porque continua mostrando fontes de outros lugares e outras realidades? E mesmo na House isso continua não sendo a câmara do plenário, é apenas uma parte dela.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quanto tempo vai levar a você parar de querer impor as suas opiniões por cima dos outros? Primeiro move sem discussão, a seguir ameaça bloquear e agora está a tentar argumentar com "outras realidades", quando já não tem mais argumentos e já sabe que não pode ameaçar impunemente? Saiba que, com estas suas atitudes, perdeu qualquer consideração que tinha ganho. Tm (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Devido ao seu deficiente conhecimento da língua inglesa, à proverbial casmurrice, e ao desprezo pelos procedimentos de moção de categorias, você lançou o caos em toda essa categorização. Vou esperar até que outra pessoa tenha a paciência de o educar sobre o que é uma câmara de plenário, e depois volto a repor tudo como estava. Se mesmo assim insistir na asneira, tanto na do nome como nas suas moções trapalhonas, já sabe onde vai parar, e desta vez espero que apanhe um mês.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enfim... Em vez de discutir, continua com as ameaças? Por isso já se vê que é inútil continuar com estas mensagem, pelo "excelente" exemplo de comportamento por parte de um administrador, mesmo tendo em conta qualquer situação externa que possa estar a ocorrer. Tm (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eu tento evitar conflitos, tanto que já abandonei essa categorização à completa trapalhice que você anda a fazer. Mas realmente a aplicação de um conceito anglófono ao parlamento brasileiro, porque leu mal o artigo da Wikipédia anglófona e achou que era um termo "aprovado por falantes nativos de inglês", como se os falantes de inglês fossem superiores aos outros, ou assim - o que não deixa de ser irónico, quando insiste em usar "Senado Federal do Brasil" quando existe tradução perfeitamente estabelecida para inglês; e mais uma vez a trapalhice que faz ao mover as categorias, continuando a cortar de um lado e a colar do outro como se ainda estivessemos em 2007, realmente tiram qualquer um do sério. E é sempre você, e só você que faz isso. É impressionante.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 22:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Já agora, você não achou estranho que os seus "floors", que você garante que estão totalmente correctos, sejam os únicos plenários categorizados assim aqui no Commons? Será que estão todos errados menos você?-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Hello Tm/Archive 11, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Desperate Journalist at Privatclub (24649055658).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nathalie Volk (35079317976).jpg[edit]

File:Nathalie Volk (35079317976).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

NVolk97 (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Service members, DoD civilians and military families committed to mission success (49843698167).jpg[edit]

File:Service members, DoD civilians and military families committed to mission success (49843698167).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Friend[edit]

Is our friend back, or is it just a friend of a friend? Vysotsky (talk) 18:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky: I think that your talking about Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImperialArchivesRU and apologize if i´am wrong and in that case i ask that you correct me. Albeit our little friend seems give a proof of life in Wikidata, but i almost sure (99%) that this user is not in any way related with Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/ImperialArchivesRU. Right now i cannot answer in greater detail, but in a few hours i will present my assessment. Tm (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Clear. Vysotsky (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fake News (48708611322).jpg[edit]

File:Fake News (48708611322).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

187.143.42.165 00:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates in Category:Orchids[edit]

@Tm: Hello TM, please check the 148 pictures in Category:Orchids. I think all these photos are duplicates. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freetown 4 (49758072392).jpg[edit]

File:Freetown 4 (49758072392).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freetown 7 (49757341563).jpg[edit]

File:Freetown 7 (49757341563).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bunny_Bleu[edit]

Bunny Bleu has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FredWalsh (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wrestling_Isn't_Wrestling[edit]

Wrestling Isn't Wrestling has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

MisterSynergy (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Naval Academy Graduation Categories[edit]

I don't know where my head is today, but I seemed to have accidentally screwed up a lot of the pictures in Category:U.S. Naval Academy Graduation May 12, 2020, between accidentally putting them in the May 14 category, taking them out but hiding the change, etc. I think I have fixed all of my mistakes now, but I just wanted to apologize regardless. --Elisfkc (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: No problem. Anyone can make mistakes and, just as an example, i´ve made some mistakes just a few days ago like delete proper categories. And the number of files in the categories in Flickr correspond with the number of files in each album in Flickr, so no harm done. Cheers. Tm (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swearing-in Event May 16 (49921798862).jpg[edit]

File:Swearing-in Event May 16 (49921798862).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 18:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMIE at night (21690125821).jpg[edit]

File:AMIE at night (21690125821).jpg has been marked for speedy deletions, Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by User:Chenzw. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actinocephalus[edit]

Observo que ha revertido Actinocephalus, adjuntado referencias obsoletas, excepto Kew que es actual y que si lo mira bien indica que ha sido sustituido por Paepalanthus. Saludos.--MILEPRI (talk) 07:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:SoroSuub X-34 Landspeeder Luke Skywalkers AboveNose CECF 9April2011 (14577849146).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

cats[edit]

Category:George Floyd protests is currently four levels above Category:George Floyd protests in Washington, D.C. on June 2, 2020. Please stop adding these files back into Category:George Floyd protests. Thank you, Featous (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing them, before there all have been review by me. Tm (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Animated Curfew Breaker.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Animated Curfew Breaker.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Animated Curfew Breaker.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

廣九直通車 (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jada Stevens and Kelsi Monroe at AVN Expo 2016 (25037794363).jpg[edit]

File:Jada Stevens and Kelsi Monroe at AVN Expo 2016 (25037794363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

179.236.72.180 17:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike D'angelo - 49982542672.jpg[edit]

File:Mike D'angelo - 49982542672.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike D'angelo - 49982286011.jpg[edit]

File:Mike D'angelo - 49982286011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BLM Protest 5-30-55.jpg[edit]

File:BLM Protest 5-30-55.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Outside East Lake Hennepin County Library (49956443363).jpg[edit]

File:Outside East Lake Hennepin County Library (49956443363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg[edit]

File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg[edit]

File:Virtual Board Of Public Works (49916742546).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FredWalsh (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting my edits[edit]

Wikimedia allows people to upload a new version of an image [1]. I have found, and uploaded a newer version of certain images, so why do you keep reverting them? PhotoBooth11 (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are ovwerwriting files with different works of art\sources, when upload under a new name is the norm. So upload your versions\works of art under a new filename. Tm (talk) 22:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are the same work of art, but i've uploaded a better quality version of it. If you look at the 4 images you will see what i'm talking about!! PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read Commons:Overwrite. Tm (talk) 22:22, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem now is all of the better quality images aren't on wikipedia anymore. So if you can add them we won't be warring anymore!! PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop lying, as you can see that so called "better quality images" are alread uploaded under new filenames but you keep overwriting them, so you are the one that is warring.

Can you add the images to wikipedia please!! PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you expect to 1- fall for that excuse that you cant see them, 2 - Even if you cant see what is clearly marked and linked i will not explain where they are, as i´am not your employee and your actions do not warrant such favour. Tm (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you're not going to add images to wikipedia? PhotoBooth11 (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop wasting my time. I´am not your employee that you can order around. Tm (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you threw a tantrum and can't even be bothered to add images you've uploaded to wikipedia...PhotoBooth11 (talk) 23:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one that overwrites images with others completely different, keep reverting even after warnings of other users, keep open deletion requests of different works of art just by spite. and i´am the one that is making a tamtrum? Tm (talk) 23:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomes[edit]

Por favor, agradaço-te que não voltares a renomar "Category:International railway line between Barca d'Alva and La Fuente de San Esteban" para "Category:Linha Internacional de Barca d’Alva a La Fregeneda e a Salamanca". Além de ser o inglês a língua padrão para as categorias em Commons, trata-se de uma linha espanhola, portanto, não faz sentido colocares o nome em português. Também não voltes a fazer, por favor, a troca de "Category:International railway bridge over river Águeda" para "Category:Ponte Internacional do Rio Águeda". Trata-se de uma ponte que liga os dois paises, portanto, além de ser o inglês a língua padrão em Commons, não faz sentido privilegiares "o nome" português. Se voltares a fazê-lo, vou ter de põr uma queixa. --Lojwe (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A linha foi construída por iniciativa e capitais portugueses (Silva, J.R. e Ribeiro, M. (2008). Os comboios de Portugal - Volume I. 3ª Edição.Terramar.Lisboa) e o nome da Ponte já existe há muito tempo, conforme várias outras entre Portugal e Espanha com nomes portugueses ou espanhóis. Tm (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

E a linha também é em Portugal ou Barca de Alva agora é Espanha? Tm (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muitas empresas portuguesas/espanholas/qualquer nacionalidade constróem infraestruturas no estrangeiro e não colocam o nome na sua língua, bem como no caso das espanholas. O inglês é a lingua padrão na Commons. A discussão não faz sentido. --Lojwe (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Faz sentido, esta linha foi feita para ligar o Porto e a região Duriense ao Centro da Europa, daí que a iniciativa e os capitais tenham sido exclusivamente portugueses. E a linha é Luso-espanhola pois abrange os dois territórios, não exclusivemnete em Espanha. E eu sugeria que leia bem as políticas, pois a lingua inglesa não é usada em nomes próprios. Tm (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A sua afirmação de que "trata-se de uma linha espanhola" é contradita pelo próprio nome da Linha em Espanhol Línea Pocinho-La Fuente de San Esteban ou agora do Pocinho para leste (distrito da Bragança) é Espanha? Tm (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isto não é um nome próprio. É só uma ponte, não tem nome. Ter nome seria alguma coisa como Ponte 25 de Avril. Eu não tenho problema em que coloques o nome em português em qualquer coisa apenas portuguesa, mas aqui é uma coisa partilhada. --Lojwe (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

O artigo na Wikipedia em espanhol não está correto, pois o troço de Pocinho até Barca d'Alva faz parta da linha do Douro. --Lojwe (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

.Pois, quando não interessa não tem nome próprio (e todas as pontes famosas tem nome próprio) e quando interessa os artigos estão errados. Tm (talk) 21:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Não é quando interessa. Eu não tenho interesse nenhum, só quero que o sujeito fique bem e o mais neutral possível. Vou editar o artigo da linha Línea Pocinho-La Fuente de San Esteban para que fique bem. Além disso, não acho que esta seja uma ponte famosa. Há muitas pontes assim na raia, sem nome próprio. --Lojwe (talk) 21:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

.Esta ponte, bem como a estação próxima, é bem conhecida em Portugal. E diz que "Vou editar o artigo da linha Línea Pocinho-La Fuente de San Esteban para que fique bem". Estou para ver as referencias que encontra para suportar o que afirma. Tm (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:0310 - Moskau 2015 (26373082796).jpg[edit]

File:0310 - Moskau 2015 (26373082796).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portuguese border west of Badajoz on BA-020 (48852760412).jpg[edit]

File:Portuguese border west of Badajoz on BA-020 (48852760412).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853078278).jpg[edit]

File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853078278).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vivar del Cid (48853141113).jpg[edit]

File:Vivar del Cid (48853141113).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saab 9-5NG in southern grounds (48794688483).jpg[edit]

File:Saab 9-5NG in southern grounds (48794688483).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarifa (48808325917).jpg[edit]

File:Tarifa (48808325917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarifa (48808326932).jpg[edit]

File:Tarifa (48808326932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 20:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ronda, Andalucia (48794640917).jpg[edit]

File:Ronda, Andalucia (48794640917).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853082158).jpg[edit]

File:Torre Mountain, highest point of mainland Portugal (1993 m) (48853082158).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Labrang (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:London skyline (292412338).jpg

Yours sincerely, 17jiangz1 (talk) 05:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49883694608).jpg[edit]

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49883694608).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49884195051).jpg[edit]

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49884195051).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unreasonable requests to delete my pictures[edit]

Hello. Thank you for saving my File:COLUMBUS STATE STATUE REMOVED.jpg picture. The same person who tried to delete that is also trying to delete File:May 1, 2020 Ohio Anti-COVID-19 Lock-down Protest.jpg and File:May 28, 2020, Aftermath of George Floyd Riot in Columbus, Ohio.jpg They are claiming that these images are not my own work but they are. I took them for the purpose of documenting history. Can you help? ThanksGingerbreadhouse97 (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385451575).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385451575).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385460965).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385460965).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385469645).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385469645).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385503555).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385503555).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385597313).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385597313).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385616363).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385616363).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385620603).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385620603).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385625323).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385625323).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385629923).jpg[edit]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385629923).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GRDN711 (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385667803).jpg[edit]

Template:Idw/layout GRDN711 (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385681903).jpg[edit]

Template:Idw/layout GRDN711 (talk) 15:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385822124).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GRDN711 ([[User talk:GRDN711|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385826874).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GRDN711 ([[User talk:GRDN711|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385861184).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GRDN711 ([[User talk:GRDN711|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385870444).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GRDN711 ([[User talk:GRDN711|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Short-eared Owl (13385881264).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GRDN711 ([[User talk:GRDN711|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rumble In The Valley- Release 20k By May 4IMG 0466 (49814489713).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ambere nude in a photographic studio 02.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate MayfieldKings ([[User talk:MayfieldKings|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gilda Roberts @ Salon Mutzenbacher 2010 02.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate MayfieldKings ([[User talk:MayfieldKings|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pile of Poo or U+1F4A9 (31891643061).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate MayfieldKings ([[User talk:MayfieldKings|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freedom Or Bust May Day Rally (Ohio) bIMG 1116 (49843906701).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freedom Or Bust May Day Rally (Ohio) bIMG 1329 (49843906501).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Santa Rita de Cássia (ship, 1995)[edit]

You changed the category. But have a look at the image. The name of the vessel is painted with large letters on the ship. Here in Commons we use the names of categories the names as painted on the vessel. To make it easy to find images. So the Category:S.ta Rita de Cássia (ship, 1995) was the correct category. --Stunteltje ([[User talk:Stunteltje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In what policies do you base your assertions? Also do you know what means that dot in portuguese in this context. My move was correct, as shown by the local municipality, local news site, regional radio, regional newspaper or a national newspaper. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:18, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately we do not have strict rules for naming categories in Commons. But it is intended to make it as easy as possible to find images. No problem at all with different naming systems, based on the language, in local wikipedia's. But Commons is for international use. Not exepert international users are not aware of what that dot means in portuguese language and look for the ship by the name as painted on the vessel. I categorised thausands of ship and follow that practice. --Stunteltje ([[User talk:Stunteltje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But the name is "Santa Rita de Cássia" and that is the name that is the dot in S.ta is merely an abbreviation of S[an]ta and anyone that searchs this ship will search for its name, not an abbreviation, and so using an abbreviation that almost none no-portuguese speaker would know and also many portuguese speakers and so this would not "make it as easy as possible to find images". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:40, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"S.ta Rita de Cássia" ferry references in Google search= 16900 against "S.ta Rita de Cássia" ferry references in Google search= 1. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. Good argument. I'll rest my case. There is a redirect. --Stunteltje ([[User talk:Stunteltje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Display Of Support For Health Care Workers In New York City COVID19.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Photographs by Latin Temptation and Category:Sandra Reehs[edit]

What is the difference between these two categories? They contain almost exactly the same files but are in different categories for some inexplicable reason. FredWalsh ([[User talk:FredWalsh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/07/Category:Photographs by Latin Temptation. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at it and it is not a useful discussion. It does not answer the question of why we need two categories for the same group of photos. Why can’t we have all those photos in one category e.g. Category:Sandra_Reehs and make it a subcategory of Category:Photographs_by_Flickr_photographer? FredWalsh ([[User talk:FredWalsh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the useful discussion. Reason given to delete "Category:Photographs by Latin Temptation"= "Same as Category:Sandra Reehs. Kept per "Not the same purpose : subcat of Category:Photographs by Flickr photographer (...) per discussion." The two categories are "Not [for] the same purpose". Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I should rephrase this. Is the Flickr user Latin Temptation a different person from Sandra Reehs? Are there any photos that are in one but not both categories? FredWalsh ([[User talk:FredWalsh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CLASSISCHER CREAMPIE.jpg, File:Penis ejaculates inside a vagina.webm, File:25 year old couple record a natural insemination inside a fertile vagina results in full term pregnancy in slow motion -2.webm[edit]

It's not the anus. And also, the woman is his girlfriend. Stop undoing. Theo.phonchana ([[User talk:Theo.phonchana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC) Abiut being\not being the anus read the description. And this is not a single woman but three different user\uploaders, none has stated that three different women are their girlfriends. Proofs of what you state? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, all duplicates[edit]

Hello. I already told you November last year that you had uploaded a bunch of images from Flickr from my account although they were all already on Commons (they are not equal because on Commons I add a watermark). You've again uploaded a bunch of team (same like last time and new ones). I don't know how do you choose them on Flickr, but please, could you refrain from uploading images from my Flickr account. If you don't do that I'll change the license on Commons (to CC-NC-SA) to avoid this, but that would be a pity, I guess. --Poco a poco ([[User talk:Poco a poco|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ann on a wall (13365643545).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল ([[User talk:মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019.06.09 Capital Pride Festival and Concert, Washington, DC USA 1600265 (48038843517).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019.06.09 Capital Pride Festival and Concert, Washington, DC USA 1600265 (48038843517).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Borough of Wirral[edit]

Please look at where this is. In particular, Wildboarclough is in Cheshire. You clearly don't know what you are doing. Not happy at having my time wasted at this time of night. Thanks. Rodhullandemu ([[User talk:Rodhullandemu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de Valencia (24985518619).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Barrio del Carmen (25095338261).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia The Lounge Cafe Bar (25188536815).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHANI SCHEEPERS (6705950381).jpg[edit]

Hi, notice newly uploaded File:CHANI SCHEEPERS (6705950381).jpg is tagged by commons as a duplicate of File:Chanelle Scheepers 2012.jpg. Good day, DGtal ([[User talk:DGtal|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:11, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:SORANA CIRSTEA (3244659897).jpg, File:Dominika Cibulková 2010 Medibank International Sydney.jpg, File:VANIA KING (6703686575).jpg etc. You must have reuploaded an already uploaded set of images. DGtal ([[User talk:DGtal|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Plaza del Ayuntamiento (25311977285).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Avinguda del Port (25311988695).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia (25162250296).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias (24892954230).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de Valencia (25070280772).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de Valencia (25095306581).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias (25332081412).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias (25095323841).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias (25162230696).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:35, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia (24823754813).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Barrio del Carmen (24561775903).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Barrio del Carmen (25162222716).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Basílica de la Virgen de los Desamparados (25260074951).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias (25154894420).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Estación del Norte (25016382220).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:55, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Mercado Central (25188610385).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Plaza de la Reina (24685235733).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:59, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Plaza de la Reina (25188547095).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Plaza del Ayuntamiento (24681343204).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valencia Plaza Redonda (24557947764).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Joanbanjo ([[User talk:Joanbanjo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lisbon tram 721[edit]

Boa tarde Tm. Por favor DEIXA essa página como está, o tram 721 de Lisboa não tem nada a ver com a categoria: Vila Verde, tens que ter muita atenção. Saúde Xicodaponte ([[User talk:Xicodaponte|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Electrico 721 da Carris, atualmente presente no concelho de Vila Verde, distrito de Braga, Portugal.. E não não me trate com a informalidade de um compincha. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:To all those who have served, thank you. Happy Veterans Day. (10807819263).jpg

Binksternet ([[User talk:Binksternet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:18, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About upload image[edit]

Hi, I'm a Japanese user and I'm "Senjūkaisi". I have a request for uploading images. Like File:Hawker Hurricane Mk.IIa'Z3055-HA-E' (50196737266).jpg and File:Hawker Hurricane Mk.IIa'Z3055-HA-E' (50196190043).jpg. , Do not upload one that already has the same image. Also, make sure that the category in which the image is placed is appropriate. 先従隗始 ([[User talk:先従隗始|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copenhagen The Little Mermaid (43624717274).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Pugilist ([[User talk:Pugilist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20200205 LisbonTour 6990 (49658473992).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Markgrafenheide bei Rostock 0stsee (49832957231).jpg[edit]

Hallo, Tm! Would you please like to explain this? You twice moved back the file to a more meaningless name. Furthermore, the spelling is wrong: 0 instead of O at "Ostsee". --Veliensis ([[User talk:Veliensis|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Map renames[edit]

Why are you renaming files like File:1889 bird's eye view map of Middleborough, Massachusetts.jpg to File:1889 bird's eye view map of Middleborough, Massachusetts (2673681639).jpg? I cannot understand why the flickr number of a smaller version of the image with an incorrect license is remotely important to have in a filename. Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have continued to make bad moves, and have refused to reply to multiple users questioning you about these moves, I have revoked your filemover right. Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping I didn't answer to one other, not multiple users as you claim, as those moves were self-evident as to keep the flickr number and so there was no need to reply as those files were uploaded from Flickr so they should keep their flickr number, and the accounts that made those files names were official accounts of the german Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute and Norman B. Leventhal Map Center. Revoking my filemover right is as an unilateral move without any warning and appeal is nonsense as i kept your names+the flickr number and have not made any bad moves. If you think to the contrary why dont you open an removal request and let other peers make their comments instead of this single user action? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Dont know if the first ping was received by you as i made a mistake in your username. Care to answer the above reply? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained your tool misuse and behavior in more detail on your COM:RFR posting. I'm not sure what else you're looking for. Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping I have debunked your claims of tool misuse and behavior. Please retract your untrue accusations, now that you know why almost all those blocks have been reverted. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are focusing on tangential issues and have not addressed any of the reasons why I removed the right:

You repeatedly reverted clearly beneficial renames; in cases like this one, you replaced a clear and accurate filename with a generic one. COM:FRNOT states that Template:Tq
You do not use edit summaries for your moves: of your last 500 moves, less than 5% have edit summaries.
You were moving files solely to add the flickr number, which is not a valid rename reason per Commons:File renaming. This is especially problematic, as I mentioned above, because the full-size files were not even available on flickr, and because the files have an incorrect license on flickr.
Most importantly, you refused to respond to two different objections - both by experienced contributors, no less - on your talk page. Response to queries about your usage of advanced permissions is a critical requirement of having such permissions.

Until you make it clear that you understand why all four of these behaviors are problematic, and explain how you will avoid doing them in the future, I will not support the restoration of the filemover right. Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this one is "an beneficial rename"?. Original filename is "File:Rostock Ostsee (49832531778)" in german and the moved is "File:Rostock Stadthafen aerial photograph 2019-08-11 02.jpg" in english. Now is it possible to move an filename from german to english? Then Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed policy is wrong when it says that "Files should NOT be renamed only to translate the filename to another language (...) Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages.". Is anyone saying that moving a filename from German to English is supported by policy?

I did not reverted your correct change of license, so your comment that "the files have an incorrect license on flickr" is irrelevant and tangential. Besides the reasons i said above, also Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_be_renamed? clearly says that files can be moved "At the original uploader’s request" as there was no "Unless there is a compelling reason not to".

It is irrelevant and tangential that "do not use edit summaries", as you claimed. Where is the policy that forces or advises strongly to it? Is it better to put almost all your moves as the blank and uniformative "clarify subject"?

"You refused to respond to two different objections", because, no one is forced to answer in his talkpage to keep tools or where is the policy that states this, when there is a clear reason not to a reply? Thats why there is administrators noticeboards, file discussion pages, category discussions, etc. Also should i respond to someone that moves to other language against what states the file moving policy? Or use a request by the original uploader? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Also it seems i´am not be the only one making file renaming guidelines. Not only you delete important information with your moves like when you deleted the Library of Congress Control Number 74693296 when you moved File:Highlandville, Massachusetts 1887. LOC 74693296.jpg to File:1887 bird's eye view map of Highlandville, Massachusetts.jpg, but he also delete important information like "Perspective map not drawn to scale. Hand colored. Bird's-eye-view. LC Panoramic maps (2nd ed.), 298.1 Available also through the Library of Congress Web site as a raster image. Includes illus. AACR2: 110" (that is hand-coloured, a 2 edition of this map, that is not drawn to scale), "Shelf ID G3764.N33A3 1887 .B3", "Location United States · Needham Heights · Massachusetts" and the fact that this map is part of the collection of "American Memory" and "Geography And Map Division". Cared to inform the original uploader of your supressions of information? What is more serious, the supression of important information or a dispute about what should be the proper filename Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping File:1887 bird's eye view map of Highlandville, Massachusetts LOC 74693296.jpg has now been re-renamed, one of the files mentioned here that was part of the LOC batch upload projects. It is inappropriate to remove reference numbers from filenames when these are part of a standard naming convention. Further it is not a Commons norm to strip unique identity references from filenames, such as Internet Archive identity, Library of Congress LCCNs, OCLC references from book plates, etc. In particular it is the norm to include Flickr photo numbers in the filename, as most Flickr upload tools will do. These make it extremely easy to double check if files have already been uploaded by using a (processing cheap) search for titles, rather than using full source searches or regex searches (which may time-out).

Tm makes some perfectly valid points. Please reconsider the action in removing Tm's right, in the light that your own recent usage of file moves is non-standard and controversial. At a minimum as the acting administrator, it would be smart to take this administrator action for independent opinions at AN. Based on the few examples raised by Tm, your own use of the move rights is disruptive and against the guidelines, and itself may become subject to more detailed review should anyone want to trawl through the logs for a complete report of moves that strip identity numbers or arbitrarily change the file name language to English. At a personal level, I tend to ignore renames on my uploads, leaving it to the good judgement of others. Just because I have not rejected these moves within my own projects does not mean that these are not an issue, only that we have more urgent problems to solve together. Thanks --Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Would you mind to make these same or other comments in Commons:Requests_for_rights#Tm. I would appreciate it, whatever those comments are. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will look at it. Middle of the night, and only up because of health issues, so best look at it when I'm feeling more rested. --Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping All of that is completely beside the point. Users with advanced permissions are expected to use those tools in a collaborative manner, including making their intentions clear and communicating with other editors when needed. Regardless of whether it is preferable to have source identifiers in the filename, Tm's actions of wheel-warring, refusing to use edit summaries while doing so, and refusing to communicate with other editors questioning those actions are absolutely unacceptable.

Regarding source identifiers in file names, where is the policy or consensus that they should not be removed from the file name when a file is being renamed for other reasons? (For all these maps that I renamed, I was standardizing the filename to "[date] bird's eye view map of [location]"; the previous names only had location. I was also uploading the full-size file directly from the source, replacing the much smaller version from flickr.) In particular, where has the community decided that flickr image numbers - which are only used by flickr, rather than identifiers like LCCN that may be cross-referenced by other sources - must be kept in the filename? Search handles redirects just fine; no one is breaking anyone's mass uploads by renaming. (If the source identifier is really that important, why not use something like structured data designed for querying, rather than filenames which are designed for human readability?) Also remember: the vast majority of people reusing images from Commons are not Commons editors, and certainly have not transferred files from flickr to Commons, and thus have absolutely no idea what the random numbers in the filename are.

Regarding language, the German-English filenames that Tm reverted were still more useful/specific for German speakers (Rostock Stadthafen = Rostock Harbor, plus the date) than his version (Rostock Ostsee = Rostock Baltic Sea, no date). If keeping the filenames solely in German was really the issue, why not ask the user who requested renaming (who is a native German speaker according to their userpage) to suggest an all-German filename, and/or politely ask the original filemovers not to approve interlanguage moves? Those would be collaborative rather than reactive behaviors.

And if you're looking to dig up dirt on me (why, exactly?), I'll spare you the effort: I've made exactly one interlanguage move, the vast majority of my renames that remove flickr number are either files I uploaded myself or a batch that another editor uploaded specifically for me to sort, and the most recent other files I renamed removing flickr numbers were some files from this mass upload. Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus you looking for is Commons:File renaming. The harmonization of file names, such as during User:Fæ/LOC_maps which the example above conflicted with, is covered and you broke it. There is also the explicit statement Template:Tq you broke this too.

As for structured data, that would be exceptionally silly, considering that these are effectively invisible in source or Commons searches. We may as well be deleting the information.

Should you continue to fail to comply with the official guideline, then your rogue actions and forcing your personal ideas about renaming on the community using your authority as an administrator, will have to be raised at COM:AN. We have plenty of constructive things to do, please reconsider the path you are forcing us down here as I suspect you don't care that much about it to invest significantly more time on this. As for you only recalling a couple of examples of you making non-compliant renames, this is sufficient to demonstrate the case.

Your action against Tm is controversial, if only because your comprehension of the guidelines, that you are using to punish Tm for, appears weak or plainly wrong. From your statement here, is it safe to presume that you have now refused to ask for independent opinions about your action from the administrator community? Thanks --Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Od As you seem very entrenched, gone ahead and raised Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Independent_opinions_requests_for_the_removal_of_FR_rights_for_Tm. Suggest neither you nor Tm rehash the evidence there that is already here. The intention is to avoid forum shopping, but to encourage fresh eyes on the evidence.

BTW, the precise statement that you made one interlanguage move is certainly incorrect, considering File:Dépôt_tram_Lechmere.jpg was moved from a French name to an English one in May this year, I have not tried searching your full history. --Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-51-1 Toy, Press Action, Mac the Sailor (5517819626).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-51-1 Toy, Press Action, Mac the Sailor (5517819636).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could sort a bit in Flickr uploads?[edit]

Hey! I have noticed that you like to upload files from Flickr. You upload many good images. But I wonder if you could sort a bit in them? Sometimes you upload files that are almost identical. And in Category:Demonstrations and protests in Lisbon there are 805 files. I have not checked if you uploaded them all but perhaps 50 files were enough? For example there is 17 photos of this man File:Beja merece+ em Lisboa IMG 2836 (27165347017).jpg. If he is special then the photos of him should be in a separate category. If it's just a random guy then why som many photos of him? --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Festival internacional de jardins, Ponte de Lima, Portugal (164850235).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:0841 - Moskau 2015 - Metrostation Kiewskaja (26335137241).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle ([[User talk:Sealle|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sanderling photos[edit]

Please stop reverting my work improving these photos, this is within the guidelines for photo edits. They were unused before I edited them, due to their poor lighting and composition; I brightened them and improved the composition for a specific purpose, as they were the only potentially good quality photos of the nominate subspecies of Sanderling in breeding plumage on Commons, and therefore important for Wikispecies and Wikidata as the best representation of the species. Now you have returned them to the very dark, almost invisible, state, and do not look good as the top headline photos of the species. Thanks. - MPF ([[User talk:MPF|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk of this crops being within the guidelines does not hold to scrutiny. For proper "guidelines", see proper policies like Commons:Overwriting_existing_files#Substantial_crop_or_un-crop and why your substancial crops are not ok. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The crop hasn't affected the subject (the bird), so it is clearly as in the museum specimen example "cropping much closer to the object was considered a minor crop". What was cropped is only blurred foreground and blurred background, which are not part of the subject. It isn't like cropping the man's body to show just his face, or cropping half the mountain (the original subject of Zizalga.jpg) to focus on the trees (the changed subject of the cropped derivative photo, which, b.t.w., I did). - MPF ([[User talk:MPF|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to rename my uploaded photo.[edit]

Filename contains info I no longer want online. Please simply rename it to "Pendulum" or something like that. Thank you in advance.

Heknu ([[User talk:Heknu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deya on the Train to Porto (28034502907).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jcornelius ([[User talk:Jcornelius|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Porque[edit]

tu não falas comigo se tens um problema com as minhas categorizações? Não sabia que tinhas um problema com isso, e mesmo não vale a pena de fazer e refazer mudanças. Cumprimentos, --Jcornelius ([[User talk:Jcornelius|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have any problem with you, except your informal treatment of "tu" when we were never school budies. But you did moved all images of Category:Santa Apolónia train station that had trains to Category:Trains in Santa Apolónia train station even when they showed more things more than the trains, like Category:Platforms in Santa Apolónia train station and i didnt reverted you, i merely added appropriate categories. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Porque "Graffiti on unidentified locations in Porto"?[edit]

Porque colocar imagens com o nome da rua e/ou o edifício nesta categoria? Não entendo a não ser que seja por uma falha (o que acontece a todos) --JotaCartas ([[User talk:JotaCartas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me (28303567349).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate El Grafo ([[User talk:El Grafo|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noronha da Costa 01 (16339235646).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noronha da Costa 01 (16339235646).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ymblanter ([[User talk:Ymblanter|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:This is not a landscape (40371670033).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Sweethearts - Phone (32152787677).jpg

And also:

Screenshots of videos -Killarnee (C•T•U) 13:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images by Senedd Cymru – Welsh Parliament[edit]

Hi. I note that you've been harvesting Senedd Cymru – Welsh Parliament photographs from Flickr. Great work! However, the name changed a few years ago, so Category:National Assembly for Wales should now be a redirect -> the new name Category:Senedd. Thanks. Llywelyn2000 ([[User talk:Llywelyn2000|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Tm,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your [[Special:ListFiles/BASEPAGENAME|upload log]], and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Gatling gun[edit]

I'm not an expert but I think he's right it's a gatling gun as opposed to a maxim... Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly this is not an maxim gun, as the maxim gun was the first successful automatic machine gun (i.e. did not needed an manual motion to fire after the first trigger pull), but is an hand cranked machine gun. I´am still tring to find the model (an six barrel gun), albeit without success until now, but the ammo drum seems to be an accles drum. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useful would be to find an table of organization and equipment of the "7th Battalion, London Regiment" or equivalent of arould 1895\1897. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The US army used the Colt M1883 Gatling Gun with the accles drum, but this one has 10 barrels, instead of 6, as the above. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping This link confirms that this is an gatling gun. Template:Ping You moved File:Cooper King7.jpg from Category:Manually powered machine guns to Category:Gatling guns. From what i wrote above and your edition, take that this is a colt model gatling gun, but do you know the model. M1883 or another? Also this image and File:3rd London Rifle Volunteers, 1897.jpg are categorized in Category:7th Battalion, London Regiment but the two images state that the battalion depicted is the "3rd London Rifle Volunteers", so shouldn't they be categorized under Category:3rd Battalion, London Regiment? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh move it back if you disagree, I can't be bothered with this place any more. Andy Dingley ([[User talk:Andy Dingley|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping I never said that this wasn't an gatling gun, and i knew that this was never a mxim gun. Now i agree with your assessment, from what i "researched" and from what you wrote in Category:Accles drum (and probably an 6 barreled Colt M1883 from you agreeing that the drum was an accles drum and what you wrote on Category:Accles drum), what i asked is if the two images, if they depict the 3rd Batallion , shouldn't they be in Category:3rd Battalion, London Regiment instead of Category:7th Battalion, London Regiment. Good edits. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy with all the suggested changes, to be honest I had no hand in identifying the Army corps. --Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

about the croped images[edit]

he,

I just wanted to know the reason you reverted my crops. So, I can prevent the error in the furture.

--Wvdp ([[User talk:Wvdp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Those images were digitalized by GLAM´s and those cropped areas are part of the original and integral to the document\image, not a recent addiction. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Commons:Media_for_cleanup states that its ok to crop the "excess "padding" on the sides of an image, especially from scans of images from printed works.". and the original version is preserved in the revision history. And except for maybe the astronaut images where there were some numbers at the side of the image, there were no important part of the images that were cropped. so I don't agree with your assessment. --Wvdp ([[User talk:Wvdp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Underground Montreal 1 (7959663546).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Kuwait Towers (4416866433).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bear snorkeling near underwater cam (courtesy of Anonymous Fan) (11596331506).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate (｀・ω・´) (talk) 13:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TypeScript bodypaint (15003177534).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ···日本穣^{Talk to Nihonjoe} 00:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

flickr review File:Coastal Biologist on Sedge Meadows NPS Video Josh Palau (44086563312).jpg[edit]

Hi, i´m reviewing the file and noticed the you uploaded just a black screen, not the full video. Is that ok? Rodrigolopes ([[User talk:Rodrigolopes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping It was uploaded as part of a batch upload, but unfortunately the tool in unable to distinguish between videos and photos. I nominated to speedy deletion as an "Accidental upload". Thanks for the question and continue the good work. P.S. As per your name, talkpage and edits you seem to be a speaker of portuguese language, we can cominicate in portuguese, if you prefere. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado, acho que é o costume de ver todo mundo falando em inglês por aqui e nem vi que tinha a informação que você fala português. rrsrs Rodrigolopes ([[User talk:Rodrigolopes|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sem nenhum problema :). A maioria dos frequentadores do Commons falam em inglês por que é a língua franca do site, por isso qualquer um de nós já deve ter comunicado involuntariamente com outro contribuidor lusófono em inglês. Cumprimentos. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014SchleswigJagel-8261.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate --ToprakM ^✉ 00:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:BabyYoda (49867454761).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ILoveCocomelon _{Ho Ho Hoǃ} 14:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization of WMATA uploads[edit]

I have noticed that you are uploading a large number of files into Category:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. This is a broad category that has numerous subcategories for stations, rolling stock, etc. Unless you are planning to add proper categorization and descriptions immediately after upload, please instead place files in a dedicated cleanup category (I recommend a title like Category:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority files needing curation) and place that in Category:Files from Flickr needing cleanup. That makes it possible to track which files need curation, and prevents the content category from being clogged with unsorted images. If you do chose to sort the images yourself, I am glad to assist if you have questions about an ID. Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Sorry to answer you so late, but meanwhile i´ve some better categorization, like proper stations categories and someone (i think it was you) also made several edits, so most images have proper categories. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I've deleted some duplicates as well - Ben Schumin occasionally uploads some of his images directly here as well. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User Pibwl and categorising/DR's[edit]

Hi. I have seen some of the DR's you commented on that Pibwl has started. I understand your frustration at his DR's but instead of biting their head off, how about coaching them? They could really use your advice - perhaps they don't know where to look like you do. Gbawden ([[User talk:Gbawden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Comment The frustration is due to the lack of proper research when said research takes less time to do then to nominate files and is pretty easy to "know where to look" as this info is the filepage or is a click away and not in some arcane site\database\library\archive, and this user is not a newbie, but an user that has 16 years of experience in Commons. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNIQLO Pop-Up store at Union Square station (10333508835).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Germania, 1882 1020017 (4358323359).jpg — without the ugly brown stains[edit]

Why should we use a picture with so many ugly brown stains? I suggest to prefer the better copy without these awful stains and we shouldn't revert again the picture to the old and first version. Would this be alright, Tm?--Runologe ([[User talk:Runologe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:27, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Comment First, it was in use in several other Wikipedias before your edits and adictions to other Wikipedias, second you reduced the resolution from 1 800 × 2 028 to 749 × 853, third the original is more faithfull to the condition of the historical book. If you like, upload your version under a new filename. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Dear Tm,

I do not understand, why do you think that the Lisbon category should contain almost 5000 elements. There is a template on it asking for re-categorizing and diminishing the number of elements in this category. I try to help, you withdraw my work. It is illogical and very unfriendly.Szilas ([[User talk:Szilas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Comment What are you talking about? What i do is move files to more proper categories, not leave them in a upper category. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For instance I removed the File:"UBER EATS"! WHO? (30543907048).jpg from the category Lisbon, because it was anyway in the category Street photography in Lisbon and you have put it back. But maybe it was only a misunderstanding, in that case it's all right. Szilas ([[User talk:Szilas|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, where it was taken? Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing the same with random categories at Category:Oxford. There is no reason for Category:October 2008 in Oxford to be within the 2008 and October subcategories and randomly stored at the main Oxford page. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What were you expecting to happen when a third user moved dozens of images from Category:Oxford to "Category:[year] in Oxford", i.e. moved from where to when, alas removed the information of where it was taken and\removed the opportunity for others to move to more precise location categories. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I expect that images that were taken in Oxford in that year would be organized as Oxford in that year. There is nothing gained by having all tens of thousands of Oxford images in the main Oxford category. If you want to create a gallery, that's a different matter. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have already answered you. And little more than 400 images are not tens of thousands, and we all are volunteers, not employees, so if you want to have the images moved more specific location categories like buildings, etc, make yourself the proper edits. Tm ([[User talk:Tm#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are dates a proper subcategory or not? If I move it into buildings but don't bother with the date, that's okay with you but the reverse is a problem? Just because you don't find it useful doesn't mean it's not useful but fine, if you want them in the main category for further categorization, then say that in the edit summary and I'll ignore it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Laser Sword (41911654072).jpg

Yours sincerely, -Killarnee (C•T•U) 21:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (324) (8175144634).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (365) (8174906415).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reverts of photos[edit]

Hi Tm I noticed you reverted my 27 clean ups. That is fine. I wont try again. But I would like to understand why it was done.

I posted on my page a few weeks ago that I wanted to do this and no one objected at the time. So I did a few to see what would happen.

I was disappointed because they were my flickr photos that were copied to wiki without my knowledge. I was just trying to clean them up and fix mistakes.

If you could respond, not because I am complaining but just so I can understand. Many thanks

Peter Glyn ([[User talk:Peter Glyn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Glyn ([[User talk:Peter Glyn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For your reference

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peter_Glyn#Photos_brought_over_from_Flickr Peter Glyn ([[User talk:Peter Glyn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Glyn ([[User talk:Peter Glyn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Please also see Special:Diff/521452553. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kia (7639635810).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Pibwl ([[User talk:Pibwl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]