User talk:P199

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

/Archive 1, /Archive 2, /Archive 3

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:P199.

This is the user talk page of P199, where you can send messages and comments to P199.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


Request for template edit[edit]

Hello. Happy New Year!

Could you have a look at my request at Template talk:PD-US-patent#Removing the 1989 date content? I am asking an admin directly, because from what I can see (e.g. at Template talk:National Railway Museum permission) the wait can sometimes be months before such a request is processed.

Thanks in advance. Veverve (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Veverve: I won't act on this right away, to allow time for discussion/comments by others. Regards, --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:55, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you process my request now? Veverve (talk) 07:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I allow myself to sed you a reminder. Could you process my edit request at Template talk:PD-US-patent#Removing the 1989 date content?
I also add that it would be wise to also process the edit request at Template talk:National Railway Museum permission since it has had no opposition for months. Veverve (talk) 21:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Veverve: done both updates, except translations to Arabic and Chinese for PD-US-patent. Therefore, that request is still open. Regards, --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for processing this.
1) Could you also process the proposal by Mikhail Ryazanov, still at Template talk:PD-US-patent#Removing the 1989 date content?
2) What about all the patents deleted from WCommons due to this template containing incorrect information for 10 years (e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/File:Keurig K-cup patent drawing.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Magpul Magazine Patent No20100212653A1.pdf, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fractal antenna patent.gif, Commons:Deletion requests/File:US5800311 Wrist exerciser.PNG, Commons:Deletion requests/File:FJ DUARTE POLARIZATION ROTATOR.jpg)? Veverve (talk) 20:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Veverve: Done #1. For #2, you'll need to go through COM:UNDEL. And don't forget to ask Arabic and Chinese speaking admins for the other translations. Regards, --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:32, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-nomination for deletion[edit]

Hello and a happy new year! :)

I originally submitted File:Krabbenbroetchen-01.jpg for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Krabbenbroetchen-01.jpg. At that point, the file was kept due to COM:INUSE.

AFAICT, that is no longer the case. Would you re-consider the file for deletion?

Thanks in advance. RudolfSchreier (talk) 09:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RudolfSchreier, simply renominate it. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 09:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bali Arts Market[edit]

At Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bali Arts Market you summarized this as "deleted" but I see a few hours later that it's been kept. With its much-reduced content, now added parent categories, and with Category:Balama now redirecting here, I think that's actually fine, assuming that the remaining content there does not consist entirely of copyright violations. But if you are keeping it, then you probably want to revise your closing remark on the DR. - Jmabel ! talk 04:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: No. The DR was about Files in Category:Bali Arts Market, not the category itself.
BTW, as for the duplication between categories Balama and Bali Arts Market, that was already resolved by others before I closed this DR. As for the remaining images in the category, they were not part of this DR. Regards, --P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies. I deal with a lot more CfDs than DRs, and got confused. - Jmabel ! talk 18:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahnhof alt, Tailfingen (1).jpg[edit]

Hi. You removed the Licensed PD template on the above file with the summary, "changed license (an exact photo/copy of a PD photo remains PD)."[1] However, the file is not an exact copy of a PD work. Similar to a frame of a painting, we see the wire binding at the top of the image and that the camera is angled slightly off from horizontal. There is a small amount of creativity here in the choice of shot. We could argue de minimis but why go to the effort when the uploader has already provided a license for the photographic element? From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Springer_A73_with_her_younger_calf_Storm_A116_looking_well.jpg[edit]

Hi. For this file, you recently changed a category from British Columbia to Salish Sea. Knowing these orca populations, I submit this is going in the wrong direction. The photographed orcas are northern resident orcas (see Wikipedia article), which inhabit more northern British Columbia waters (where they were photographed), and rarely enter the Salish Sea, which is the territory of southern resident orcas. Thus the category Salish Sea is not so much a refinement, but rather restricts the orcas concerned to a marginal territory. Please revise or discuss this edit. Rebecca Beecham Gotzl (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebecca Beecham Gotzl: Thank you for that information. For now I changed the category to "Bodies of water in British Columbia". Please feel free to make corrections as necessary ("anyone can edit"). --P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Being inexperienced with Wikimedia Commons, I had not thought of the category “Bodies of water in British Columbia”, and had originally used the category “British Columbia”, which was discarded. I see your intervention above is a factual improvement, and I thank you for your attention to this discussion, which has been educative for me. Rebecca Beecham Gotzl (talk) 05:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:P199&oldid=856483303"