Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch  English  français  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  português do Brasil  русский  Tiếng Việt  +/−

Commons:Language policy edit

Hallo there, please read the Commons:Language policy and especially Commons:Categories#Category_names. Thank you for your cooperation. Gryffindor (talk) 21:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not speaking that you are moving many categories created more than 10 years ago without any discussion, you conveniently forgot to mention where it says "A particular individual object (a specific person, building, monument, artwork, organization, event, etc.) generally uses a singular form (but not always). Proper nouns which do not have an established English variant are not translated ad hoc but use the original form." These are clear examples of prouper names and also, and i say this as a portuguese native speaker, you made some really bad ad hoc "translations" without any understanding of what you are doing or "translating!, and that appears to me that shows that you probably do not know any single word of portuguese, much less be able to translate portuguese. Tm (talk) 22:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also you moved Category:Museum of Ethnology, Vienna to Category:Weltmuseum Wien or Category:Beyond Brazil - Exhibition 2012 to Category:Jenseits von Brasilien. Also several french, danish, swedish or german are in their native names, also some as created by you like Category:Pavillon du Trèfle or Category:Château de Chanteheux that are in french just as a few examples. Tm (talk) 23:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yulia Tymoshenko in 2023 edit

please correct to cat: old-aged women of Ukraine in 2023 because of age Albedo (talk) 13:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Operation Motorman (left) and The Runner (right) mural (42115874371).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Petrol Bomber, Battle of the Bogside (28243078888).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:April 2018 Chagall Oil Painting (26541646627).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Beekman-Poughquag (50803845131).jpg edit

 
File:Beekman-Poughquag (50803845131).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Boardmasters2023 (97 of 171) (53120163026).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boardmasters2023 (97 of 171) (53120163026).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:20, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:ATA-trained bomb techs with the Royal Thai Police Metropolitan Police Bureau collect evidence after rendering safe an IED outside the Royal Thai Police headquarters in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128762997).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:ATA-trained Thai investigators, bomb techs, and forensic science officers examine circuitry of an IED via a video camera attached to an x-ray device in Bangkok on August 2, 2019. (49128578491).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Boston Field Office Royal Protective Detail (52553764703).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Boston Field Office Royal Protective Detail (52553699690).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Boston Field Office Royal Protective Detail (52553520449).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Boston Field Office Royal Protective Detail (52553520109).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy holidays! 🎉 edit

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Tm, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,

// sikander { talk } 🦖 22:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

// sikander { talk } 🦖 22:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JopkeB (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Wolf scat (34185340421).jpg edit

 
File:Wolf scat (34185340421).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GnocchiFan (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Vivian Schmitt cropped.jpg edit

Hi, since you have now reverted this version https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vivian_Schmitt_cropped.jpg to an early file, would you be ok with me uploading this version https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/cf/20240108220210%21Vivian_Schmitt_cropped.jpg under the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vivian_Schmitt_02.jpg ?--FMSky (talk) 22:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Upload your versions under new filenames like i did to this version in File:Vivian Schmitt cropped2.jpg. Tm (talk) 22:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes but in this case there were only 2 pixels cropped off from the right, so why created a whole new file? --FMSky (talk) 22:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
In File:Vivian Schmitt cropped.jpg it was you that said that "this version has color correction" when you reverted. But now you say that "in this case there were only 2 pixels cropped off from the right. So why" did you overwrote the original file? Tm (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Read my original post again, you didnt understand what i meant --FMSky (talk) 22:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your version in https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/cf/20240108220210%21Vivian_Schmitt_cropped.jpg is already in File:Vivian Schmitt cropped2.jpg as i said from the beginning. Tm (talk) 22:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thats not what i asked though, you created this file after i already made the post on your talk page --FMSky (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You left your first message at my talkpage at 22:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC) and i made the upload to File:Vivian Schmitt cropped2.jpg at 22:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC). So unless the time now counts in reverse 22:23 is after 22:03 so your statement that "you created this file after i already made the post on your talk page" is not accurate as i made the upload 20 minutes before your first message. Tm (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@FMSky: In File:Vivian Schmitt cropped.jpg it was you that said that "this version has color correction" when you reverted like if it was a big thing. But now you say that "in this case there were only 2 pixels cropped off from the right like if it was a small and minor thing. So why did you overwrote the original file? Tm (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Basically what i mean: Upload THIS IMAGE to THIS FILE --FMSky (talk) 22:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your version in https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/c/cf/20240108220210%21Vivian_Schmitt_cropped.jpg is already in File:Vivian Schmitt cropped2.jpg as i said from the beginning in case you still have not understood ("like i did to this version in File:Vivian Schmitt cropped2.jpg"). Tm (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thats not what i asked though, you created this file after i already made the post on your talk page --FMSky (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You left your first message at my talkpage at 22:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC) and i made the upload to File:Vivian Schmitt cropped2.jpg at 22:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC). So unless the time now counts in reverse 22:23 is after 22:03 so your statement that "you created this file after i already made the post on your talk page" is not accurate as i made the upload 20 minutes before your first message. Tm (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Agradecimento edit

Olá, venho-lhe agradecer pelo grande contributo e dedicação que tem tido com a importação de imagens da Região Autónoma da Madeira (entre outras) do Flickr aqui para o Commons. Votos de um bom ano novo, Darwin Ahoy! 14:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion edit

 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Helene Schjerfbeck (1862-1946)- The Convalescent - Toipilas - Konvalescenten (32721924996).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helene Schjerfbeck (1862-1946)- The Convalescent - Toipilas - Konvalescenten (32721924996).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Pode verificar? edit

Olá, Tm. Esta conta andou sobrescrevendo várias imagens (a maioria de 2005–2010) por versões “melhoradas” por inteligência artificial. Já reverti algumas, mas parecem ser muitas. Você poderia dar uma olhada? Cumprimentos, RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

@RodRabelo7 Já dei uma olhadela e reverti as fotos em que os originais foram substituídos por versões ampliadas por inteligência artificial. Cumprimentos. Tm (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I believe these were valid overwrites. COM:OVERWRITE states that minor fixes are OK, except for restorations for digital documents and historic artwork. These are low resolution photographs which don't fall into either of these categories. At least one was uploaded originally by the same user.
As such, I would like to restore them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Magog the Ogre, COM:OVERWRITE does not allow AI upscaling, with apparently no exceptions to this policy (see Commons:Overwriting existing files#DO NOT overwrite). Anyone can still upload them separately though. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
OK, fair enough. I believe this may apply to historical artwork, photographs, and the like. It probably doesn't apply to own works which were illustrations to begin with. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh, also, according to Commons:Overwriting existing files#DO overwrite, “[DO overwrite] replacement with higher-resolution versions of the same file, however, without using artificial methods to generate higher resolution”. I believe I have followed this guideline here, for example, when I simply found on the source a higher-resolution image identical to the one previously uploaded. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
You were overly aggressive in your reversion. Some of your edits reverted improving the color map of gif files (e.g., File:Level III ecoregions, Pacific Northwest.gif). Others reverted uploading a full-sized image instead of a thumbnail (e.g., File:PahoehoeLava (upscaled).jpg). Still others were higher-resolution images taken from original pdf source (File:Wenatchee Mountain Checker-mallow.jpg). Please don't mass revert my edits without at least alerting me or discussing with me --- I'm not a vandal. — hike395 (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The diagram was literally created in MsPaint. This was a self-made diagram. Is your position really that people can't improve the artificial diagrams that they made because they used artificial means? This is a total misunderstanding of the policy, which exists in order to protect the integrity of photographs, artwork, and the like. Just to be clear, by your definition, no one would be able to improve a lousily-rendered diagram because they used a computer to "artificially improve" it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Hike395, you may revert to your AI-upscaled versions if you believe they are not against the guidelines, I wont’t oppose at all. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Let's slow down. I'm not trying to steamroll you; there's no need to throw out the baby out with the bathwater. The AI-upscaled versions of photographs are indeed against policy. It's the diagrams where I disagree with you. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was about to say the same thing, Magog -- I shouldn't have overwritten other people's photographs, that was my error. May I overwrite my own old photographs from 20 years ago with AI upscaling? They have low resolution and I fear that they have little utility these days. — hike395 (talk) 02:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Pepe (51337009217).jpg edit

 
File:Pepe (51337009217).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Protest Justice for War Crimes in Afghanistan (50651580343).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Protest Justice for War Crimes in Afghanistan (50652419432).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Kirby (51605556030).jpg edit

 
File:Kirby (51605556030).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANU concerning Olivenza. edit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#Olivenza. Notifying you since the user didn't. Abzeronow (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Olivenza edit

Estou vendo progressos da sua parte, por isso estou mais disposto a encontrar um consenso. Sério, é tão difícil que você não força ainda mais as coisas? CFA1877 (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Com certeza está a falar de si próprio quando finalmente explicou porque removeu Category:Disputed territories de Category:Olivenza, em vez de insistir em edições do tipo que são revertidas por vários usuários desde 2007. Tm (talk) 20:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Bem. Se tiver que parecer que é um município português (já não o é), parece-me mais sensato do que a proposta que fez de “Antigos municípios”. E eliminar redundâncias não é pedir muito, eu acho. Diga me: O que você está disposto a mudar, o que não está disposto a mudar e por que não? Obrigado. CFA1877 (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Não vou escrever redundâncias ao que já expus em Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Olivenza. Cumprimentos. Tm (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
[...]. CFA1877 (talk) 21:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Isso é totalmente falso, tenha decência moral e não manipule minhas palavras. Em nenhum lugar eu disse que aceitava o jogo sujo que você está jogando no wikidata. Resolvi a questão no Wikimedia Commons. Só mais tarde você descobriu esse novo problema en Wikidata. Não se faça de vítima, você teve problemas com Lopezsuarez por questões semelhantes e aproveitou esse problema para reabrir aquele antigo problema.
Você está tentando manipular a situação de Olivença. Hoje nas relações hispano-portuguesas é uma questão menor que ninguém levanta. Será um dos poucos em Portugal que o tira. Isso é fazer política, meu senhor. No passado, outros usuários culparam isso, não sou o primeiro. Com seu comportamento descarado você não deixa muito espaço para dúvidas. Ni wikidata ni commons ni wikipedia estão lá para fazer política. CFA1877 (talk) 23:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Stop -TigrayGenocide- Columbus, OH (12.09.21) IMG 9500-(144) (51736422846).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:06.28.22 Central Ohio Student Led Rally for Reproductive Rights 03IMG 4011 (52240618655).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:06.28.22 Central Ohio Student Led Rally for Reproductive Rights IMG 4078 (52240415489).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Portugal (53502349966).jpg edit

 
File:Portugal (53502349966).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Lauren Daigle @ The Novo 05 11 2023 (53048156413).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

186.172.113.184 10:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Stop -TigrayGenocide- Columbus, OH (12.09.21) IMG 9500-(80.60) (51735602847).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Rally for Abortion Justice - March for Women 2021- Columbus (10-2-21) IMG 6000-(23) (51547639841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Nina Turner 2021 Campaign (July 30th and 31st) 00y420210730 181715(0) (51355707454).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:06.05.21 Paddle + Walk for Clean Water (Wisconsin) IMG 0015 (51231548030).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:05.29.21 Stop LInes 3 and 5 Solidarity Rally (Appleton, WI) IMG 8415 (51211951466).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:28. Maribor Station, Yugoslavia (26992988134).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

XenonX3 (talk) 20:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Lamborghini Aventador 6.5 '13 (9405754698).jpg edit

 
File:Lamborghini Aventador 6.5 '13 (9405754698).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Lamborghini Aventador at the Frankfurt Motor Show IAA 2011 (6147262880).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Protest Justice for War Crimes in Afghanistan (50652419317).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Nina Turner 2021 Campaign (July 30th and 31st) 06IMG 2320 (51355181503).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Nina Turner 2021 Campaign (July 30th and 31st) 00yIMG 9989 (51355987585).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Pousada de Santa Maria do Bouro IMG 9798 (6127816602).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:2015 Fatima 0238 (19477390520).jpg edit

 
File:2015 Fatima 0238 (19477390520).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Berthold Werner (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:2015 Fatima 0240 (19665386225).jpg edit

 
File:2015 Fatima 0240 (19665386225).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Berthold Werner (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:2015 Fatima 0241 (19044457963).jpg edit

 
File:2015 Fatima 0241 (19044457963).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Berthold Werner (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Atari Teenage Riot 2011 Gear in the dark (6189632421).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 18:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:75.UkrainianMassRally.WDC.24February2024 (53561731792).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Faience Artifact from Pompeii (48447306911).jpg edit

 
File:Faience Artifact from Pompeii (48447306911).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Columbus Housing for all (06.30.21) IMG 9194 (51324683689).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
File:06.05.21 Paddle + Walk for Clean Water (Wisconsin) IMG 0089 (51230477291).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply