User talk:Yann
/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54
- User:Yann/Valued images, 2009-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2019
- User:Yann/Quality images, 2005-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2023
- User:Yann/Featured images, 2009-2018, 2019-2023
- User:Yann/Featured media
You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Unblock
Earlier today I posted on my talk page about the unblock and the previous hour saw Andy Dingley respond to my post "I would strongly oppose any unblock!" by response of my warning of the police last May and for me to stop uploading celebrity/people pictures caused by this, forcing me an exclusivity to upload car pictures. -- Bull-Doser (talk) 12:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Officially, how long until my unblock? - Bull-Doser (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- “Indefinitely”. Now stop bugging Yann and do something more productive on or off wiki. Dronebogus (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Tegan Nox in March 2020.jpg
Hi,
You deleted file:Tegan Nox in March 2020.jpg here on Commons. The same file en:File:TeganNox2020Cropped.png is on the English Wikipedia, and I am looking at whether it should be deleted. Can you know the exact reason for deletion? See also my notes at en:File talk:TeganNox2020Cropped.png. Thanks, -- Whpq (talk) 13:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, this is a copyvio. I tagged it there. Yann (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am trying to understand why it is a copyvio. As per my notes on the file talk page, the initial source currently does not show a CC license, but the archive does show a CC license, and CC licenses are not revocable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I didn't see that. But since the video was removed on YT, I wonder if the license was valid. I undeleted it and created a regular DR instead. Yann (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- For me, the issue would be if the performance itself is copyrighted by WWE. -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think a performance can be under a copyright (at least certainly not one like this). Copyright starts when something is recorded or fixed in a tangible medium. But the quality is poor, so I wonder if the YT user recorded it live, or copied it from somewhere else. Yann (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was thinking that professional wrestling is a scripted performance, but it really is only loosely scripted so you are right it isn't an issue. -- Whpq (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think a performance can be under a copyright (at least certainly not one like this). Copyright starts when something is recorded or fixed in a tangible medium. But the quality is poor, so I wonder if the YT user recorded it live, or copied it from somewhere else. Yann (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- For me, the issue would be if the performance itself is copyrighted by WWE. -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I didn't see that. But since the video was removed on YT, I wonder if the license was valid. I undeleted it and created a regular DR instead. Yann (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am trying to understand why it is a copyvio. As per my notes on the file talk page, the initial source currently does not show a CC license, but the archive does show a CC license, and CC licenses are not revocable. -- Whpq (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Cas d'école sur photo de collection Studio Harcourt d'avant 1991
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BrigitteAuber-1954-Harcourt.png
Bonjour cher Yann,
J'espère que tu vas bien malgré tes nombreuses activités et contributions ici et IRL. ;)
Si tu veux bien donner ton avis concernant les principes (assez pointus il faut le reconnaitre) concernan la collection de photo Studio Harcourt.
- Les photos de cette collection d'avant 1991 sont considérés appartenir à l'État français et de facto conformément à la réglementation nationale, être automatiquement portée au Domaine Public.
- Les photos du Studio Harcourt ont été définitivement qualifées d'oeuvres collectives dont aucun de ses différents auteurs ou collaborateurs ne peut être distingué spécifiquement.
- Même si une mention de copyright contraire est publiée, le domaine public s'applique sur Commons et WP, dès lors que la mention "Studio Harcourt" est clairement spécifiée comme crédit.
On m'oppose certains arguments d'ancienneté d'une photo (70 ans minimum) alors que d'autres photos de la collections Harcourt bien plus récentes ont bien été publiées dans Commons sous licence libre, y compris par les Studio Harcourt eux-mêmes ou par d'autres musées.
Merci de confirmer ces points très spécifiques au droit et à la règlementation française. Je vais aussi solliciter plusieurs de nos autres amis experts ici.
Je te souhaite une excellente fin de journée. Tisourcier (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Cette photo sera dans le domaine public en France l'année prochaine. Pour les Etats-Unis, c'est beaucoup moins clair. Je suis plutôt contre de supprimer des documents quand le statuts vis-à-vis de l'URAA n'est pas clair, mais je suis en minorité sur ce point. Yann (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Request
When you get a chance, would you mind taking a look at this over at fr.wp? I don't want to show up and be disruptive by not being a local, but this sure seems like half short story and half advertisement. GMGtalk 12:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sure. Obviously blatant abuse of WEBHOST, etc. Yann (talk) 12:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Protection request
Hello Yann,
Can you temporarily protect File:Dubbing films in Europe.png?
I noted in the Dubbing article in English Wikipedia, which uses this file, that it was reverted and clashed with the color bars and legends in that article, as well as in the file itself.
In the reverted edition, there are more colorings and they are totally ambiguous, as no legends and sources are given, as to what they are supposed to represent; and this has totally messed up with the original uploaded version with its color bars and legends given in 19 languages of this file, as well as in the numerous Wikipedia articles which use this file with its corresponding color bars and legends.
Kindest regards, Lavassa (talk) 12:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done I also blocked the last edit-warrior. Yann (talk) 14:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Lavassa (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup
Bonjour de Montréal , Canada . Je désire personnellement te remercier Pour tout ton travail et ton implication Avec les nouveaux . Je suis nouvelle . Ma page de discussion Est toujours ouverte tu es le ou la bienvenue sur ma page de discussion . Héron du fleuve (talk) 18:12, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Why did you delete Fotos used in the German Wikipedia
Why did you delete so many of my fotos I used for different (of my) Wikipedia projekts in the German Wikipedia?
They are not private and are used for illustration and how do you know they are not my personal art? (Which is wrong)
Please change the deletion. Mitumial (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
There might be one foto - hot chip challenge - which was a violation of copyright by my mistake. But you deleted so many fotos just for illustration of German Wikipedia articles I supported or wrote. For example the Foto of a German author Nicolas Samuel Lietzau-Schreiber, articles about homosexuality, about getting the German citicenship, articles about carving, about camping...Mitumial (talk) 06:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mitumial: I undeleted this one, but we need a permission. Please read COM:SCOPE and COM:L. Yann (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm the author of both: the Foto and what is shown.
- Why did you delete for instance these Fotos?
- They are all taken by me, part of articles I wrote and they are even showing my art. Most of the pictures you deleted are just like this. Mitumial (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mitumial: OK, I undeleted these files. Yann (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! :) It would be great if you could undelete more of my illustration - I would be really happy! :
- File:IMG Wertmarke.jpg
- • File:IMG babyspeck.jpg
- File:IMG-Emos2023.jpg
- • File:IMG Asian Flush young woman.jpg
- • File:Sofa in Gebrauch.jpg
- • File:IMG Asian Flush.jpg
- • File:IMG Frau mit medizinischer Maske.jpg
- • File:IMG Schlafende.jpg
- • File:IMG Bikinistreifen.jpg
- • File:IMG Metal Frisur.jpg
- • File:IMG Girl Camping.jpg
- • File:IMG DeepDream.jpg
- • File:Deep Dream Art 02.jpg
- File:Schwule Zweisamkeit.jpg
- • File:IMG woman "manspreading".jpg
- File:IMG Goaß Maß.jpg
- • File:IMG Rauchende.jpg
- • File:IMG-Taco.jpg
- • File:PXL 20230810 142604420.PORTRAIT.jpg
- • File:IMG-Nachdenklichkeit.jpg
- • File:Image Duschender.jpg
- • File:PXL Camping.jpg
- • File:IMG Strandurlaub.jpg
- • File:IMG Lesende.jpg
- • File:IMG MannundMaßkrug.jpg
- • File:IMGStrandkorb.jpg
- • File:IMG Armstulpen.jpg
- • File:IMG Brille.jpg
- • File:IMG Mann trägt Brille.jpg
- • File:IMG-Dozent JCI.jpg
- • File:IMG Bánh mì.jpg
- • File:IMG Biertrinker.jpg
- • File:IMG Sonnenbrille.jpg
- • File:IMG Pfeffi.jpg
- • File:IMG WGT.jpg
- File:IMG Armstulpen.jpg
- • File:IMG Brille.jpg
- • File:IMG Mann trägt Brille.jpg
- • File:IMG-Dozent JCI.jpg
- • File:IMG Bánh mì.jpg
- • File:IMG Biertrinker.jpg
- • File:IMG Sonnenbrille.jpg
- • File:IMG Pfeffi.jpg
- • File:IMG WGT.jpg
- • File:IMG Noctolus.jpg
- • File:IMG-Frau isst Kuchen.jpg
- • File:IMG Bierschaum.jpg
- • File:IMG-Paddle.jpg
- • File:IMG Nicolas Samuel Lietzau-Schreiber.jpg
- • File:IMG Schirmmütze junge Frau.jpg
- • File:IMG Frau spielt Dart in Kneipe.jpg
- • File:IMG Drei Freunde Alltagsmaske.jpg
- • File: DeepDream.jpg Mitumial (talk) 22:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleting my files
why did you delete the flag and logo of dodoma?? It's official. Please reverse the deletion.Eehuiio (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Eehuiio: You need the permission from the copyright holder to upload it to Commons. Yann (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- how Eehuiio (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Eehuiio: Ask the copyright holder to send a permission via COM:VRT. Otherwise it can't be on Commons. Yann (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'll do that. Sorry for the stupid question. Eehuiio (talk) 23:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Eehuiio: Ask the copyright holder to send a permission via COM:VRT. Otherwise it can't be on Commons. Yann (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- how Eehuiio (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Col Arif Mehmood Shaheed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Saqib (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of files of my authorship
Hello. You deleted some files I uploaded from commons. While I didn’t actually give a license for files downloaded from the Internet, I don’t understand deleting my own works. Greetings, Maks8697 (talk) 14:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
File:A Farewell to Arms (1932) by Frank Borzage.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
SDudley (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Do you have an opinion on how much due diligence we need to have to prove a negative? It is impossible to prove a negative, we only have due diligence. RAN (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Hi,
- I am usually more open to assume public domain for old pictures, but a UK 1940 picture is probably still under a copyright in USA, unless it is a work by the UK government. These don't really look like official pictures (may be File:Grandpa laszkiewicz as Flight lieutenant.jpg, but some more evidence would be useful). Pictures of Poland from that time are in the public domain, but why pictures taken in UK would be first published in Poland? Yann (talk) 10:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)